CHL
Supervision Continuing Education (SCE)
SELF-STUDY PLANS

 

Supervisory Continuing Education (SCE) lessons provide members with ongoing education focusing on supervisory or management issues. These lessons are designed for CHL re-certification, but can be of value to any CRCST in a management or supervisory role.

You can use these lessons as an in-service with your staff, or visit www.iahcsmm.org for online grading at a nominal fee ($5 per single lesson plan, or bundled packages are available for quantities of 6 lessons for $25 (save $5) or 12 lessons for $50 (save $10) for greater savings).

Each lesson plan graded online with a passing score of 70% or higher is worth one point (contact hour). You can use these points toward either your re-certification of CRCST (12 points) or CHL (6 points), but you can not use them for both.

Mailed submissions to IAHCSMM will not be graded and will not be granted a point value (paper/pencil grading of the SCE Lesson Plans is not available through IAHCSMM or Purdue University; IAHCSMM accepts only online subscriptions of the SCE Lesson Plans).

 

IAHCSMM now has the ability to grade any of our lesson plans online for a nominal fee. And not only will grading be instantaneous, but your passing score will be immediately sent to IAHCSMM headquarters and applied toward your account.

The more lesson plans you complete online, the less paperwork you’ll have to submit with your annual dues. So whether you want to tackle all of your points at once or you want to take your time throughout the coming months, you now have an easy, convenient and FAST option to re-certify.

  • Lesson Plans can be graded online with an activation code given by IAHCSMM
  • To receive an activation code, please visit our store at www.iahcsmm.org/ecommerce/store.php
  • Lesson Plans are worth 1 (one) point each and cost $5 per grading attempt or
    • Bundled packages:
      • Purchase 6 plans worth 6 points for $25 (save $5)
      • Purchase 12 plans worth 12 points for $50 (save $10)
  • Only IAHCSMM (www.iahcsmm.org), offers online grading for all 3 of the lesson plans offered through Communiqué:
    • 3M sponsored CRCST - Technical Continuing Education (TCE) Lesson Plans
    • Aesculap sponsored CIS - Instrument Continuing Education (ICE) Lesson Plans
    • IAHCSMM sponsored CHL - Supervision Continuing Education (SCE) Lesson Plans

Make your choice below, picking the appropriate Lesson Plan for your certification. Lesson Plans are shown with most recent first. Have your copy of Communique open to the article or click on the link next to the Lesson Plan to open the article in a separate browser window.

After activating the quiz, you will be be asked to fill in your first and last name (mandatory) in addition to your IAHCSMM Membership Number and your choice of billing cycle to apply your grade.

If you fail the quiz (minimum of 70% to receive credit as a passing grade), you will need to attempt another exam grading to receive credit — please purchase either a new activation number or use one of the remaining numbers you may have purchased in a bundle package.

If you pass, you are encouraged to print the confirmation page out as your proof of a passing grade. Upon receipt of your annual dues/re-certification invoice, a listing of passed lesson plans will be deducted from the points due on the statement, and you should compare your printed confirmations to this list.

 

 

 

This column was written by Jack Ninemeier, Ph.D, CHA of the Eli Broad Graduate School of Management at Michigan State University. Dr. Ninemeier is the editor of Central Service Technical Manual (5th Edition), Supervision Principles: Leadership Strategies for Healthcare Facilities (2nd Edition), and Material Management and the Healthcare Industry, all published by IAHCSMM.

 

Lesson Plan CHL 310
Doing the “Right” Thing (Part 2: Social Responsibility)
[Reprinted from Communiqué: November/December 2008]

In the first article in this two-part series, we addressed the need for Central Service managers to make ethical decisions, and we presented some basic information helpful in assuring that they do so. In this article, we explore the social responsibilities of these managers and their employers—healthcare facilities—to be “good citizens” in their communities, in their state and nation, and even around the world. The main emphasis: the best managers recognize their ethical concerns and the results of applying basic human resources principles extend beyond the boundaries of their department, their facility, and even their local community.1

What is Social Responsibility?

The concept of social responsibility (often referred to as “corporate responsibility” in the world of business) relates, in part, to the efforts that a healthcare facility makes to consider and address commitments to its constituencies including patients, employees, businesses including suppliers, and investors, (if applicable). It is, hopefully, obvious that a healthcare facility must satisfactorily address commitments to these stakeholders. Note: Part I of this series addressed, in part, ethical concerns related to suppliers, and numerous (most) articles in this column that began more than twenty years ago in Communiqué have focused on the relationship between Central Services managers and their employees.

The concept of social responsibility extends the obligations of healthcare facilities by suggesting that they also have responsibilities to the community-at-large and to society more generally. What are these responsibilities? They include concerns that healthcare professionals become involved in outreach activities within their specific communities and in society as a whole. Some examples such as providing the best-possible healthcare at all times including during natural disasters and other emergencies are obvious. Others (examples: the provision of healthcare education within the community, contributions to the research efforts of educational institutions, and activities relating to professional associations) depend, in part, upon a facility’s resources. However, the interests of facility administrators and staff members will also determine the type and extent of social responsibilities that will be addressed.

Today’s society increasingly emphasizes that its organizations be good citizens, and healthcare professionals including those in Central Service can do so in many ways such as when they:

  • Assume a responsibility toward the environment by controlling (minimizing) the pollution of air, water, and land. Healthcare facilities can participate in environmentally-friendly initiatives such as recycling, conserving energy, and giving priorities to the use of environmentally “friendly” packaging.

  • Contribute time and money to worthwhile community projects and charitable causes.

  • Serve on advisory boards of educational institutions offering healthcare career preparation programs. For example, they can update faculty about industry standards and trends, and they can serve as mentors to students and graduates.

  • Offer their facility as a clinical site to provide educational and training experiences that help assure a local workforce and to provide community service.

  • Donate equipment and instruments to programs that can best use them such as those providing free and/or low cost services and to teaching programs located within their communities and around the world.

  • Facilitate the sponsorship of programs that provide healthcare workers and supplies to countries needing medical assistance.

  • Provide services during times of disasters and other emergencies.2

  • Coordinate activities for employees that provide volunteer services for the community.

The above and numerous other examples of how healthcare professionals can increase their scope of service to a broader community base require a sense of direction from top-level administrators. They also require the interest of and enthusiasm from the facility’s staff members who must have an expanded definition of “ethics” beyond relationships with their internal constituencies. Instead, ethical concerns should include an ever-expanding definition of “community” that extends beyond the city limits of a facility’s location and, perhaps even state and national boundaries. In each instance, enlightened and ethical human resources are integral to fulfilling the mission of being a good global citizen.

Role of Central Service Managers

At this point, careful readers might be thinking, “While healthcare facilities do have some social responsibilities, how do they relate to the work of Central Service managers? The answer to this question addresses at least two issues:

  • Cultural consistency within the facility – Can leaders of a healthcare facility and the Central Service department within it really be concerned about patient, employee, and investor constituencies without being concerned about the rights of others? Managers help to shape a facility’s culture, and they serve as role models for others within their organization. If Central Service managers are genuinely concerned about using their specialized knowledge, skills, and abilities to provide applicable services within their communities, it is likely that their employees will mirror this concern and likewise have an interest in doing so. Consider, for example, the impact of positive publicity (free-of-charge information in the media that attracts attention to a facility) that arises as organizations participate in community activities, and assist with (or take a lead in) addressing broad societal concerns. These contributions cannot be made unless someone facilitates their planning and implementation. Central Service managers and their staff members can be the catalysts in making these things happen.

  • Employer-of-choice concerns – Some organizations are known within their communities to be preferable places to work, and applicants are attracted to those which have favorable reputations. Likewise, other enterprises may be thought of as the “employers of last resort.” Networks of young people enrolled in community colleges and universities who are seeking employment want to learn about potential employers. An organization’s reputation is influenced by how its employees are treated (another reference to ethical issues addressed in the first article in this series). Current employees tell family, friends, and others about their at-work experiences, and the facility’s employment reputation is known to many persons within the community. A healthcare facility with an unfavorable reputation within the community will not be looked to or be respected for its efforts to provide community services. Central Service managers influence the reputation of their facility by how they interact with those whom they supervise.

All healthcare managers and many citizens in every community are well aware of concerns that patients receive the best possible healthcare, the financial implications of this goal, and the impact of governmental concerns and regulations that extend significantly beyond the purpose of this article: to address human resources concerns of healthcare social responsibility. However, without effective Central Service employees and staff members in all other departments of the facility, the proper medical care can not be delivered, and the facility can not meet its social responsibility obligations. Therefore, it is not a stretch to state that Central Service managers help their employer to attain social responsibility goals as they eliminate discrimination, promote employee health and safety, advocate for diversity, respect union rights, if applicable, and otherwise practice effective human resources skills. Managers must effectively recruit, train, retain, and motivate the most qualified staff members. In the context of Central Service, they must effectively manage to best assure that there will always be knowledgeable, trained, and motivated staff members to deliver products and services to their healthcare peers who directly serve the patients and the community.

Figure 1 shows the relationship between healthcare facility employees, including those in the Central Service department, and the attainment of a facility’s social responsibilities.

Figure 1

As seen in Figure 1, the actions of a facility’s managers, including those in Central Service, directly impact employees. They, in turn, influence the delivery of products and services which enable the facility to fulfill its societal responsibilities. The supervisory knowledge, skills, and abilities of managers influence their leadership of employees, and an ethical decision-making process is integral to the relationship between managers and those whom they manage.

An article discussing ethics was written for this column in 2003.3 It included a list of questions that one could pose to help determine whether potential decisions will be ethical. Each of these questions can be slightly paraphrased to help Central Service managers consider the worth of assisting their facilities with social responsibilities:

  • Will what I intend to do be helpful to those in the community?

  • Would I be proud to tell my family about what I have done?

  • Would I be happy if my decision was a headline in the local community or healthcare facility’s newspaper?

  • Can I be happy with myself if I implement my decision?

  • Would I like someone else to do this if I was affected by the action?

  • Does my proposed action hurt anyone?

  • Is my proposed decision reflective of my desire to be “professional?”

  • What if everyone made the same decision that I made?

  • Will the community be “better” if I do this?

Everyone benefits when organizations assume social responsibility for their actions. Is this factor the primary concern of a person applying for a position in the Central Service department of a healthcare facility? Probably not. Do those employed by an organization “feel good” when they hear and/or read positive things about their organization? Probably so. Would employees of a healthcare organization like to contribute their time and even money to worthwhile causes sponsored or coordinated by their employer? Many would. You can see, then, that the extent of a facility’s social responsibility is impacted by the management of its human resources. Central Service managers can make a difference in the lives of many of their stakeholders. The best managers recognize this and expand their definition of ethics to include the dimension of social responsibility.

Endnotes

  1. The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Natalie Lind, Education Director, International Association of Healthcare Materiel Management, for her assistance with this article.
  2. A review of ways that Central Service personnel can assist with community disaster plans are found in: Central Service Technical Manual, Seventh Edition. Chicago, IL. International Association of Healthcare Central Service Materiel Management. 2007. (See Chapter 21)
  3. Jack Ninemeier. Just a Matter of Ethics. Communiqué. International Association of Healthcare Central Service Materiel Management. July-August. 2003.